Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-03-03 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 80.9 score against 72. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy S6 Active construction is much lighter but just a little thicker than OPPO Reno3 Pro.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a GPU. The Galaxy S6 Active features a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a way larger sensor. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.