Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 general score. Galaxy S7's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little better performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more 2200 MHz cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a bit sharper display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen and way more opaque screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixel quantity per display inch. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.