Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Although it's the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a older, just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker device than OPPO Reno3 Pro. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and way less brightness, it also counts with a better pixel quantity in each display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S7 Active's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in OPPO Reno3 Pro, although the Galaxy S7 Active has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.