Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a global score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's design is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it was released 4 years before. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a larger screen. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.