Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has a global score of 81.9, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Even being the best in this comparison, the Galaxy S8 Active construction is incredibly older, heavier and thicker than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Galaxy S8 Active's CPU is just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's processor, and although the Galaxy S8 Active has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and much less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a slightly better memory for apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's battery lifetime is just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's battery duration, although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.