Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a global score of 83.3 against 72. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S9 is older and a little bit thicker than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a much worse amount of pixels in each inch of screen and a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 400 GB. Galaxy S9 features a little better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has a 34% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.