Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 80.1 score against 72. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. Despite being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is noticeably heavier and notably thicker than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per inch in the screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 12 percent more battery size.
OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution, a way higher resolution camera and a way larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.