Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a general score of 81 against 72. Although it's the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also somewhat thicker and much heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit higher display density.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.