Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's overall score of 72. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, offering some additional features. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is thinner but just a little bit heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and both were released with only a couple of months difference.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit lower display pixel density and a bit smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has greater battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4025mAh battery size against 3300mAh. The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.