Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a overall score of 85.6 against 72. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is newer and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro's, although it's a little bit heavier.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little lower screen density and a quite smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's one, both have the same internal storage. OPPO Reno3 Pro features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.