Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is just a bit heavier but somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and they were only released 5 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has more internal memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor taking lot higher quality photos and a camera with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 22% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.