Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 global score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the OPPO Reno3 Pro were released only 7 months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is thinner but also extremely heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit better pixels number per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little faster processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.