Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black Shadow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has newer 14 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, giving some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is heavier but way thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a slightly better screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels, a lot brighter screen and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a very superior memory for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 9% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.