Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ Premium has a score of 79.8, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. Despite of the fact Xperia XZ Premium is much older and a little bit heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's body is still just a little bit thinner. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a bit better processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xperia XZ Premium features a more vivid screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has way darker display and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 2160 x 3840px. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro features longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.