Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Compact is a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a 79 score against 72. The Xperia XZ2 Compact is an older and a lot thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Sony was able to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, giving some extra features and improved performance.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a screen that's very similar to the display in OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, a really smaller screen and much darker screen, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations and a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much longer battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.