Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a general score of 82.2 against 72. Although it's the best phone in this review, the Xperia XZ2 Premium is an older, a lot thicker and extremely heavier phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a better screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and much worse brightness, it also counts with a much higher 2160 x 3840 resolution and a lot higher display density. The Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 400 GB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 4025mAh battery size. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.