Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZs has a global score of 77.2, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. The Sony Xperia XZs body has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's a bit lighter. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better processor than Xperia XZs, because it has a higher number of 2.2 gigahertz cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xperia XZs counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting much worse quality videos and photos, a worse video quality, a smaller aperture and a camera with lot less mega pixels.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 39 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.