Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia Z4v is a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a 78.8 score against 72. Sony Xperia Z4v's body is just a little lighter than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is a bit thicker and was released many years before. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Sony Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a bit better processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 5 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a little sharper screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot bigger camera sensor and a bigger aperture.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Xperia Z4v, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.