Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia Z5 has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. These phones have Android OS, but the Sony Xperia Z5 has 5.1 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. Sony Xperia Z5's body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, even though it was released many years before.
Xperia Z5 counts with a screen that's just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's display, because although the Xperia Z5 has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per inch of display. OPPO Reno3 Pro has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia Z5, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xperia Z5 features a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xperia Z5 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia Z5, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more MP back facing camera.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Xperia Z5, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.