Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 545.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 3840 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 10.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 630 hours standby time 15.2 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z5 Premium has an overall score of 79.8, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia Z5 Premium has the previous 5.1 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. Xperia Z5 Premium's construction is a little bit thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is just a little heavier and was released many years before.
The Sony Xperia Z5 Premium has a brighter screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 3840 x 2160 and a much greater screen density. Sony Xperia Z5 Premium has just a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z5 Premium, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot bigger sensor. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia Z5 Premium, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z5 Premium, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.