Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a global score of 80.4 against 72. Xiaomi Black Shark is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, we must note that it's also an older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier device. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark has newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a little bit larger display, a little greater screen pixel density, much more display brightness and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Black Shark has a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way better resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
OPPO Reno3 Pro and Xiaomi Black Shark both count with quite similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark and OPPO Reno3 Pro count with extremely similar battery performance, although the Xiaomi Black Shark has just 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.