Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-03-28 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a general score of 82.3, which is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it must be noted that it's also an older, somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker phone.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features a little faster processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has much more brightness, a just a little higher pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot more MP back camera and a bigger sensor.
OPPO Reno3 Pro and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 both have very similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 feature incredibly similar batteries, although the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.