Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is way better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 86.6 score against 72. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a thicker and extremely heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little bit greater screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit better processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with improved battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 17% greater battery size. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 captures just a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have a 64 megapixels back-facing camera, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same sensor size, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.