Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Blasting black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is way better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a 90.1 score against 72. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a way thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite smaller screen and a just a bit worse number of pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has greater battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, a back facing camera with a 64 megapixels resolution, the same sensor size and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.