Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a score of 87.9, which is way better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's overall score of 72. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Xiaomi Mi 10T is a heavier and thicker phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with just a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with much more brightness and a bit higher display density.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T shoots a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a 0.59 inches back camera sensor and a same resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also counts with a lot better video resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T's storage to install applications and games is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with superior battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 24 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.