Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a general score of 81.4, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, even though it was released about 11 months before.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with way more brightness, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features as much storage to install games and applications as OPPO Reno3 Pro, they have equal internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 31 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.