Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a general score of 82.7 against 72. Although it's the best phone we compare here, we must note that it's also a a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker phone. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has much more screen brightness, a little better pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features just a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much higher 64 MP resolution camera and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro and the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro feature similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's battery life is just as good as the battery performance in OPPO Reno3 Pro, although the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.