Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A2 is a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a general score of 78 against 72. Xiaomi Mi A2's body is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released around 20 months before. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a little bit bigger display, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi A2's processing unit is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, and although the Xiaomi Mi A2 has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Mi A2 features as much storage for apps and games as OPPO Reno3 Pro, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 3010mAh.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rate and a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.