Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a global score of 77.5 against 72. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 construction is just a little thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is somewhat heavier and was released 3 years before. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a just a little better display pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with superior battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.