Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a general score of 83.8 against 72. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's just a little bit heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit larger display and a just a little better pixel amount per inch of screen. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.