Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a score of 83.8, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 design is older, a little bit thicker and heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has much more display brightness, a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.