Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a general score of 84.3, which is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a newer 14 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, providing the user some nice extra features. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is much heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's extremely thinner and also a lot newer.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a really superior performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a little more vivid display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a much brighter display, a larger screen, a much higher 2224 x 2488 resolution and a quite better number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and a way better video definition.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features improved battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.