Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has a general score of 76, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Mi Note 2 is way older than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's design is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 4 more processing cores (but slower) and more RAM. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite larger screen and a little higher pixel count per display inch.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 and OPPO Reno3 Pro have incredibly similar memory to install applications and games, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Note 2 features a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4070mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.