Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 general score. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is a little bit thicker and much heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. These devices work with the same Android 10 operating system. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with more screen brightness and a little bit better pixels count in each display inch.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with as much storage for applications and games as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 17 percent greater battery size. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back and the same camera sensor size, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.