Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an overall score of 81.6, which is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Both devices we are comparing here use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a really brighter screen and a little bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a camera that is very similar to the camera in OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the same (4K) video definition and the same sensor size.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features slightly more storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.