Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a general score of 78.2, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's overall score of 72. Xiaomi Redmi 9T is a newer phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices we are comparing include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding operating system features.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better resolution back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a much better battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.