Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 86.1 score against 72. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a somewhat heavier and a little thicker device than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, a quite lower display density and a quite smaller screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's memory capacity for apps and games is very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both have equal 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 4025mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro and OPPO Reno3 Pro feature quite similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.