Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a general score of 76.6, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Although it's the best phone in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 design is a little bit thicker and heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more RAM.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution, a way higher video quality and a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with longer battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.