Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a overall score of 81.1 against 72. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS, so both should provide you all the same operating system features.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a just a little higher pixels number in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bigger storage for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's camera is just as good as the camera in OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, they both have a 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a same size back camera sensor, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.