Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. Despite being the best we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's design is heavier and just a little bit thicker than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a CPU that is very similar to the processing unit in OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features longer battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.