Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | ZTE |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a score of 80.2, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Despite of the fact ZTE Axon 10 Pro is older and just a bit heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's body is still just a little thinner. These phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding operating system features.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit superior CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit greater screen pixel density.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution camera.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Reno3 Pro, although the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.