Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | ZTE |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 20 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a global score of 77.8 against 72. Although the ZTE Axon 20 is somewhat heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The ZTE Axon 20 features a bit superior CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better screen than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The ZTE Axon 20 counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with a 64 mega pixels resolution and a same size camera sensor, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with higher video frame rate.
ZTE Axon 20's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's one, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. The ZTE Axon 20 has just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4220mAh battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.