Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | ZTE |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a general score of 78.1, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra construction is newer and just a little thinner, but a little bit heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has the newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides some extra features and performance improvements.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better looking display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features as much memory to install applications and games as OPPO Reno3 Pro, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back-facing camera.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.