Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a general score of 85.3, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 global score. Even being the best device in our current comparison, the iPhone 11 Pro Max is an older, notably heavier and a little thicker device than OPPO Reno4 Pro. The iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 OS.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a quite superior performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 11 Pro Max features just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has much worse brightness, and they both have a screen of the same size, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a little greater amount of pixels per inch of screen.
OPPO Reno4 Pro takes better photographs and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more MP, a larger aperture for better low-light images and video and a much bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max and OPPO Reno4 Pro both have quite similar batteries duration, although the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has just 3969mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.