Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 is way better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a global score of 88.7 against 72.1. Even though Apple iPhone 12 and OPPO Reno4 Pro were released with only a couple months difference, Apple iPhone 12's design is a bit heavier but a little thinner. The Apple iPhone 12 comes with iOS 15.x OS, and OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with Android 10 OS.
The Apple iPhone 12 features a superior hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 12 counts with a slightly better looking display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater display pixels density, a quite brighter screen and a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 12, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12, because it has 128 GB internal storage. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 12, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.