Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's score of 72.1. The iPhone X construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it is just a bit heavier. Apple iPhone X features just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little bit better display than iPhone X, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with much more display brightness and a bit bigger screen. IPhone X features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Reno4 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.