Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with an 82 score against 72.1. Although the iPhone XR is a better phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, we must highlight that it is also older, heavier and just a little bit thicker. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit better screen than iPhone XR, because it has a little bit higher pixels density, a better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, much more screen brightness and a little bit larger screen.
The iPhone XR counts with a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 less cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. OPPO Reno4 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a superior memory for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.