Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. The iPhone XS construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it is a bit heavier. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a quite worse screen density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and much more brightness.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The iPhone XS has a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way more MP camera.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a really longer battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.