Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 general score. Despite of the fact Google Pixel is notably older and thicker than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM memory and more processing cores.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments, a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
The Google Pixel's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the OPPO Reno4 Pro one, they have equal 128 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.