Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, Google Pixel 2 XL's construction is older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with as much storage capacity for apps and games as the OPPO Reno4 Pro, they have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a way more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.